Bruce Dunbar: Eye Candy at Common Sense

by Sarah Hamilton

I can't imagine how difficult it would be to walk away from your creative practice, to never write, paint, sculpt, or craft again. In 1988, Edmonton artist Bruce Dunbar put his art practice on indefinite hiatus. He was tired of the politics of the art scene and saw art going a direction he was no longer interested in. Last year, Dunbar returned to painting. In his new show, Eye Candy, at Common Sense Gallery in Edmonton, Dunbar shows that his time away from art-making has brought new perspective to his painting.

Though Edmonton is regarded as one of the last bastions of modernism, and frequently chided for being staid in this regard, Dunbar's work is fresh and vibrant. Dunbar has remained a modernist in style, but his time away has disposed of some of the more conservative modernist tendencies, such as a limited colour palate, and a rigid sense of geometry. His new works are pop and luscious; he layers candy-coloured paint on black Styrofoam and mixes in metallic colours and acrylic gel. The combination of those two textures gives the paint a perceived and actual depth that draws me in and captivates me.

fifteen_web.jpg

"fifteen," Bruce Dunbar, 2008

Dunbar's work is numbered chronologically; his practice started off somewhat conservatively, with minimal paint and less aggressive sculpting. As he progresses in the series, the more expressive and curious his works become. The paint folds over itself and drips off the canvas; I found myself peering under, above, and through his works, compelled to see all the elements that brought each one together and looking for the longest acrylic stalactite in the exhibition.The serial nature of his titling as well as the repetition of his design gives the impression that these works are studies, but they seem more like experiments, with each work building upon the last, pushing the artist's relationship to the medium further and further. I want to see how lush Dunbar can make his work; how thick he can make the paint before it slides off the canvas; how much colour he's willing to incorporate and how sculptural he can make his paint.

twenty six detail_web.jpg

"twenty six" (detail), Bruce Dunbar, 2008

In "twenty-two", the deep eggplant paint froths across the pink canvas. Dunbar cuts down the work with a red line, and accents the focus on the corners with a thick layer of paint that resembles the finish of a well-iced cake. "fifteen" is a good example of Dunbar's more sculptural works; his colour bars stretch across the black plane, bookended by smooth coats of thick, glossy paint.There is a lot of room to wander through Dunbar's works, and his consistent use of black anchors the eye, allowing it to focus on the work rather than becoming overwhelmed.

twenty two_web.jpg

"twenty two," Bruce Dunbar, 2008

I'm not anticipating the return of modernism, but Dunbar's enthusiasm for the medium is contagious and refreshing. He's not going through the motions just to create an end product. Instead, he opens his palate and invites the viewer to follow along within his process, returning with work that is full of playfulness and electricity. Painting doesn't often instill an elementary sense of delight and curiosity within me, but the energy in Dunbar's work is infectious; and I find myself charmed by Dunbar's confectious offerings.

Eye Candy runs from February 21 - March 21, 2009.

Posted March 3, 2009 10:40 PM (559 words)

« Screamers and Bangers: The Wallpaper Project | Home | The Puppet Collective »
Comments

I already made these comments on Studiosavant, but I thought it couldn't hurt to post them here, too:

"Confectious" is a good neologism. Nice one, Sarah.

I' be interested to hear why Sarah says she isn't "anticipating the return of modernism".

Me, I keep hearing about all the little things like renewed interest in traditional forms like painting, a declining art market calling into question the ludicrous values assigned to today's 'conceptual' art, the crisis in post-modern criticism, etc....

It seems like these could be taken as being, like Bruce's work, or that of other artists, among signs pointing to a resurgent, or even brand New, modernism.

So, it at least seems conceivable, worth discussion, I'd say. If you're reading, Sarah, share your thoughts, please. What did you mean?

Perhaps there are those in Edmonton's art community who feel so passionately, personally violated by the notorious boogeyman-modernism I keep hearing about, that even the very idea of a renewed modernism in art is just simply out of the question. Ridiculous. Off the table. Not allowed. Verboten.

That can't be right, can it?

It's funny, really. The best art made in Edmonton is made by old- and new-school modernists, but that makes us look out of step with other cities... heaven forbid.

Perhaps, instead of constantly worrying that we're out of date, we'll begin to see how well placed we are on the cutting edge of the second coming of the Modern.

Posted by: Ryan McCourt | March 22, 2009

Hi Ryan,

Thanks for reading my article and responding to it.

I should first clarify that I'm not an anti-modernist writer or critic. I come at art from a historical perspective, so I try not to be dismissive of entire movements within the visual arts.

That said, I wrote that I'm not anticipating the return of modernism for a number of reasons. Dunbar’s work is grounded in modernist practice, but I feel like he’s pushing his work to a new level. I think I used a lot of food metaphors in my review because his work is so joyful and palatable…I feel like he’s on to something, and to automatically place him back with all his colleagues doesn’t anticipate future developments. I’m not arguing that there’s anything wrong with being a modernist, or that he wouldn’t want to be placed amongst them – they are his peers and friends. But I have a gut instinct that he’s on to something different here.

I’ve also been interested in the question of the art market, and how our meta-value of art will change during the course of this recession. I think art in general will see a boost in sales. Painting and sculpture could re-emerge as top commercial buys, but I also think that with limited budgets, prints, artist books and artist editions are also savvy buys, since they are much more affordable. Conceptual and performance art provide an art experience, and usually affordably, so I even see a public market for these works. Out of all of this, I feel like we’ll build a stronger connection with art in all its forms.

I posted a longer version of this on your blog, to elaborate. Please write or call me if you want to discuss it further. I think you’re addressing some very interesting points here.

Posted by: Sarah Hamilton | March 26, 2009